What are winding and contact resistance testing?
Winding and contact resistance are similar in that both are looking for a very low ohmic value, since they are measuring the "resistance" of a component that is supposed to conduct electricity.
A Kelvin Bridge has long been a standard method of measuring low values of resistance, and is still in use today.
With the advent of electronics, there are digital meters available that also are capable of measuring very low values (milliohms or microohms) of resistance.
The typical low-resistance ohmmeter uses four terminals (to eliminate lead resistance) in which a dc current is injected into the conductor to be measured and the voltage drop across the conductor is measured.
Contact resistance test sets can be used to measure the resistance of bus joints and cable joints, as well as the closed contacts of a circuit breaker or motor starter.
In many cases, it is a comparative type test in which the resistance of one set of contacts is compared to the readings obtained from the other two phases of the same, or a similar, piece of equipment.
Winding resistance differs from contact resistance in that the inductance of large windings can interfere with the operation of the test set.
There are test sets, available commercially, that are designed specifically for large transformer and motor windings, for cases in which a standard low-resistance ohmmeter is not adequate.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS BASIC INFORMATION
The best preventive maintenance programs start during the design of the facility. A key design consideration in order to support preventive maintenance is to accommodate planned power outages so that maintenance activities can proceed.
For example, if delivery of power is not a 24 hour necessity, then extended outages after normal work hours can be allowed for maintenance activities. Otherwise, consider design features that can speed up the maintenance process or reduce the duration of the outage to loads.
These might include redundant circuits, alternate power sources, or protective devices such as drawout circuit breakers (rather than fixed-mount circuit breakers).
Additional consideration should be given to the accessibility of the electrical equipment for maintenance. Circuit breaker location can be critical to the maintenance process.
An example would be circuit breakers that are installed in a basement that has only stairway access through which equipment can be brought down to the circuit breaker location. In addition, access to the back of switchboards or switchgear, as opposed to their being mounted against the wall, may be necessary in order to perform thorough maintenance.
The environment in which the equipment is installed can play an important part in maintenance. Where equipment is mounted (inside or outside) and whether it is properly enclosed and protected from dust, moisture, and chemical contamination are all factors that influence the frequency with which maintenance tasks should be performed.
The design phase is also the period in which the establishment of baseline data for the equipment should be considered. This can be done by including in the design specifications the acceptance or start-up testing of the equipment when it is Þrst installed. The InterNational Electrical Testing Association (NETA) provides detailed specifications for electrical power equipment in NETA ATS-1995 [B1].
Design drawings are very important to an effective maintenance program. As-built drawings should be kept up-to-date. An accurate single-line diagram is crucial to the effective and safe operation of the equipment.
This helps the operator to understand the consequences of switching a circuit that can interrupt power in an undesirable or unplanned mode. More significantly, it can help avoid the accidental energization of equipment.
As part of the procurement of the electrical equipment, consideration should be given to the tools and instruments that are required to perform effective maintenance, such as hoists or manual-lift trucks that are used to remove and install circuit breakers. These tools and instruments will help to ensure safety and productivity. Finally, the installation, operation, and maintenance manuals should be obtained and filed.
For example, if delivery of power is not a 24 hour necessity, then extended outages after normal work hours can be allowed for maintenance activities. Otherwise, consider design features that can speed up the maintenance process or reduce the duration of the outage to loads.
These might include redundant circuits, alternate power sources, or protective devices such as drawout circuit breakers (rather than fixed-mount circuit breakers).
Additional consideration should be given to the accessibility of the electrical equipment for maintenance. Circuit breaker location can be critical to the maintenance process.
An example would be circuit breakers that are installed in a basement that has only stairway access through which equipment can be brought down to the circuit breaker location. In addition, access to the back of switchboards or switchgear, as opposed to their being mounted against the wall, may be necessary in order to perform thorough maintenance.
The environment in which the equipment is installed can play an important part in maintenance. Where equipment is mounted (inside or outside) and whether it is properly enclosed and protected from dust, moisture, and chemical contamination are all factors that influence the frequency with which maintenance tasks should be performed.
The design phase is also the period in which the establishment of baseline data for the equipment should be considered. This can be done by including in the design specifications the acceptance or start-up testing of the equipment when it is Þrst installed. The InterNational Electrical Testing Association (NETA) provides detailed specifications for electrical power equipment in NETA ATS-1995 [B1].
Design drawings are very important to an effective maintenance program. As-built drawings should be kept up-to-date. An accurate single-line diagram is crucial to the effective and safe operation of the equipment.
This helps the operator to understand the consequences of switching a circuit that can interrupt power in an undesirable or unplanned mode. More significantly, it can help avoid the accidental energization of equipment.
As part of the procurement of the electrical equipment, consideration should be given to the tools and instruments that are required to perform effective maintenance, such as hoists or manual-lift trucks that are used to remove and install circuit breakers. These tools and instruments will help to ensure safety and productivity. Finally, the installation, operation, and maintenance manuals should be obtained and filed.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PHILOSOPHY BASIC INFORMATION
What are the philosophies of preventive maintenance?
Most people recognize the need for the maintenance of electrical equipment. The debate really focuses on how much maintenance is enough.
The key to the discussion over the proper amount of maintenance centers on the economic balance between the cost of performing maintenance and the importance of reliable power.
For example, a computer center with a downtime cost of $100 000 or more an hour would justify a much more extensive maintenance program than would a small facility whose downtime cost might be minuscule in comparison.
Moreover, it has been shown that there is a balance to the amount of economic benefit that is achieved from performing maintenance. A lack of maintenance eventually results in failures and a high cost to a plant.
Likewise, an extreme amount of maintenance is wasteful and also results in a high cost to a plant. The optimum maintenance program lies somewhere in between.
This balance point can vary for different types of facilities. There are two benefits to having an effective preventive maintenance program. The first is that costs are reduced through the minimizing of equipment downtime.
The second benefit is obtained through improved safety and system performance. Other intangible benefits include things such as improved employee morale, better workmanship, increased productivity, reduced absenteeism, reduced interruption of production, and improved insurance considerations.
In planning an electrical preventive maintenance (EPM) program, consideration must be given to the costs of safety, the costs associated with direct losses due to equipment damage, and the indirect costs associated with downtime or lost or inefficient production.
Most people recognize the need for the maintenance of electrical equipment. The debate really focuses on how much maintenance is enough.
The key to the discussion over the proper amount of maintenance centers on the economic balance between the cost of performing maintenance and the importance of reliable power.
For example, a computer center with a downtime cost of $100 000 or more an hour would justify a much more extensive maintenance program than would a small facility whose downtime cost might be minuscule in comparison.
Moreover, it has been shown that there is a balance to the amount of economic benefit that is achieved from performing maintenance. A lack of maintenance eventually results in failures and a high cost to a plant.
Likewise, an extreme amount of maintenance is wasteful and also results in a high cost to a plant. The optimum maintenance program lies somewhere in between.
This balance point can vary for different types of facilities. There are two benefits to having an effective preventive maintenance program. The first is that costs are reduced through the minimizing of equipment downtime.
The second benefit is obtained through improved safety and system performance. Other intangible benefits include things such as improved employee morale, better workmanship, increased productivity, reduced absenteeism, reduced interruption of production, and improved insurance considerations.
In planning an electrical preventive maintenance (EPM) program, consideration must be given to the costs of safety, the costs associated with direct losses due to equipment damage, and the indirect costs associated with downtime or lost or inefficient production.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)